Healthy Accountability

While there is a specific scriptural foundation for number 3 (Romans 14:10-14; James 4:10-12), supra, there is also other evidence – perhaps more evidence, stronger evidence – for numbers 1 & 2 or some combination of or variation on 1 & 2. I think the way accountability is handled is more important than being “properly matched” with the person to whom you are accountable. Being “accountable to” certain kinds or types of people might make the accountability process easier, or might make the person under “accountability scrutiny” more responsive to constructive criticism. Fundamentally, however, it is the accountability process that deserves focus. If we get that right, personalities and individual struggles become less relevant, because our focus is shifted from the people involved to the (1) Biblical process of resolving problems through the accountability “system” (Matthew 18:15-17; See also Galatians 6:1-2; Hebrews 10:24-25; Thessalonians 5:11; Ecclesiastes 4:9-10; Matthew 7; 1 Corinthians 5; 1 Corinthians 7:14-16; 1 Corinthians 6:1-3; 2 Thessalonians 3:5-7; 2 Thessalonians 3:14-16; and others, more than I care to list here), and (2) the specific problem (i.e., sin) being addressed. By focusing on the problem and the means by which resolution of that problem may be attained, those participating in the process are less likely to put the offender on the defensive. If it’s all about the people involved, on the other hand, you’re more likely to alienate, rather than restore, your brother in Christ.

EDIT/UPDATE: Also, I’m pretty proud of myself that this response is relatively short, compared to some of my others (even if it is longer than the article to which it is a response).

Good question, Ben. Currently my accountability falls into a combination of 1 and 2. An understanding of the struggles is helpful, but it can leave room for slacking in the process if we are not honest with one another.