How the Jews get it & the Christians miss it

benlreed —  August 14, 2012 — 19 Comments
3244

image credit: CreationSwap user Jason Harper

Traditional thinking in American Protestant culture values individual time with God. We purport that as the center of spiritual growth.

Go in your room, shut the door, and study.

Master the art of the “quiet time.” Just you and God. Not you and God and ____. Leave ____ out.

Read a book by yourself. Put headphones on and listen to a podcast by yourself. Go sit on a hammock and pray…by yourself.

This bleeds into our worship services, too. We sit in a classroom-style setting, with rows of chairs in a Sunday school class or a worship center. One person, the teacher or preacher, proclaims the Truth we need to digest, while being certain to keep our hands to ourselves. There’s no talking allowed in either setting. I even remember a note in the bulletin of a local church I attended saying, “If you have to get up during worship, please do so before the sermon starts in order to not distract the work of the Holy Spirit.” Because the Holy Spirit throws up His hands in utter ‘what-am-I-going-to-do-now’ fashion as soon as a kid gets up to go to the bathroom.

Contrast this with traditional Jewish styles of learning:

Jews seldom study Torah alone; the study of Torah is, more often than not, a social and even communal activity. Most commonly, Jews study Jewish texts in pairs, a method known as havruta (“fellowship”). In havruta, the pair struggles to understand the meaning of each passage and discusses how to apply it to the larger issues addressed and even to their own lives. – Rachael Schultz

Studying, wrestling, and seeking hard after God is done communally. We Protestants have missed that. With our rows of people, quiet services, quiet times with God, and personal spiritual growth plans, we inadvertently push people towards an individualistic faith.

My friend, James Grogan, says

Circles are better than rows.

He may have stolen that phrase, but since I don’t know who said it first, I’ll give James the credit. Circles promote group growth, unity, and a combined synergy towards knowing God, encouraging each other, correcting each other, and pushing each other towards God’s best.

The reality is that I don’t know everything there is to know about the Bible. God hasn’t revealed all angles and varied beauty of truth to me. Your life experiences have given you a certain interpretation of the texts of Scripture that help me know God more fully. Your upbringing, your failures, your pain, your victories, your passions…they all help me know God better. Not that if we study and engage God together that we have to walk out of that clones of one another. I’m still me and you’re still you. But our collective relationships with our Creator is multiplied together.

The advantages of studying together

1. We both work to fulfill the Great Commission.

Iron sharpens iron, and together we push one another to love Jesus more.

2. We build fellowship.

The early church devoted themselves to fellowship, and God honored them in this. (Acts 2:42) You can’t do this on your own.

3. We fight against pride, realizing we’re not the only ones with the “right” answer.

On your own, you’re prone to thinking you’ve got the best angle, the most understanding, and all of the “right” answers. If you thought you didn’t, you’d change your mind, right?

4. Past experiences are (at least) doubled, adding new flavors and angles to the truth.

You only have one past, one set of experiences and one mind. And thus only one insight into the vast depth of Scripture.

5. We can laugh together.

And that’s vital for our growth. If you laugh on your own, while it’s just you and God talking, people look at you weird. And put you away in “homes” for a long time.

6. We don’t get “stuck” on questions.

We’re less prone to getting stuck, because we can help each other out of our ruts of questions.

7. There’s built-in accountability.

I can’t short-cut the process of learning if I’m constantly being pushed and challenged by someone else. Alone, in a large room, though, it’s easy to disappear, not process, and not challenge myself.

8. You’re prone to being narrow-minded by yourself.

We can so easily dive straight into narrow-minded legalism and bigotry when we make our faith only about ourselves.

9. You only have 2 ears to hear from God, alone.

When you read the Scriptures and study them alone, you’re limited to your own ears. God speaks to other people besides you. You know that, right?

10. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken. (Ecclesiastes 4:12)

Obeying God is too hard. Trying to understand, and obey, the Scriptures will break you. If you go it alone.

We Protestants have missed the boat when we study, prepare, and deliberate the Scriptures by ourselves. We’re better together.

Because circles are better than rows.

 

 

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

benlreed

Posts Twitter Facebook

Christ follower, husband, father, writer, pastor of small groups at Long Hollow Baptist Church. Communications director for the Small Group Network.
  • http://www.jrforasteros.com JR. Forasteros

    1,000% agree. We’re so entrenched in the Enlightenment model of Truth. I really despise how our worship gatherings are structured – the classroom/lecture model with the rational argument (sermon) getting the lion’s share of the time instead of more corporate, participatory activities like singing, prayer and taking communion.

    Great post!!

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Thanks, JR! What are you guys doing to flip this model on its head? I know you’re thinking that direction…

      • http://www.jrforasteros.com JR. Forasteros

        Well, it’s obviously a huge challenge. Our worship space isn’t conducive for anything other than rows, so we’re limited until we make that change. BUT here’re a few things we’re doing on Sunday mornings:

        1. We have a large speaker-rotation. Right now, there are 5 different pastors plus guest speakers who communicate regularly (2 primary pastors and then the other three once a quarter or so). We’re working to expand that to a lay team. This at least helps communicate that there’s not one person who’s gifted to teach above everyone else.

        2. We include Discussion Questions for the sermons in the bulletin each week and encourage everyone to grab a few friends and work through the questions together.

        3. In July, we experimented with our format. We shortened our messages to 15 min, did creative scripture reading (we were doing all narratives so we could do dramas and videos and the like).

        4. We’re slowly incorporating more corporate prayer, responsive readings and more regular communion. We’re careful when we set these up to explain that these are participatory and why that matters for worship.

        5. We’re sharing stories of people in our congregations either via interview or video during our gatherings (on average every three weeks or so right now).

        Overall, we’re transitioning also from a very small, point-driven worship gathering to highly participatory. We’re still in the early stages, but it’s coming along.

        Our Church is big on serving our community, and that’s always done as a church body. That’s currently one of the most consistent, formative things we do.

        We’re also developing a comprehensive Spiritual Formation strategy that will include forming in community as a big part of what we do Mon-Sat.

        What about you guys?

        • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

          Dude…I love it. Write this up in a blog post, please!

          I’m taking notes…

        • http://twistedchristian.ca/dadblog twistedxtian

          These are some awesome ideas! Thanks for the inspiration.

  • http://www.seeprestonblog.com Preston Yancey

    It was essentially for this reason that I studied the medieval period the most. Every theology or doctrine in the medieval world is shaped by an understanding of conversation. God speaks collectively and holistically. We are in aching need of this kind of devotional study–one that doesn’t suppose our individual opinions about God determine something about God, but one that supposes our collective engagement with God reflects to one another something about God.

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Yes, for sure. Good stuff, Preston.

      When did you spend time studying the medieval period?

      • http://www.seeprestonblog.com Preston Yancey

        During my undergrad at Baylor, and I’m carrying the conversation about monastic practice as it relates now to the arts over with me to St. Andrews this autumn.

  • http://edsslipper.net/ Pierre

    Yes… but Matthew 6:6 is clear there, isn’t it?
    There’s clear advantages to corporate prayer, yes, and to communal learning, clearly – but there are dangers too
    Corporate faith must not obliterate individual faith, and conversely.

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Yes, I was just highlighting the other side of the coin.

  • http://twistedchristian.ca/dadblog twistedxtian

    I love this! This is something I struggled with in my preaching class. Preaching is such a central aspect to our worship service, but it is (generally) totally devoid of conversation and community.

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Yep, which is part of the reason why we at do sermon-based small groups at our church. Those give us the chance to flesh out what’s being preached.

  • http://www.jasonvana.com Jason Vana

    This is, by far, my favorite post of yours. I’ve studied a bit about how the Jewish culture would live out their faith and I was drawn to this very idea – that they studied and engaged God together. It’s why my college ministry is set up as discussion instead of preaching. Everyone has a unique perspective to give and it’s only when those perspectives come together that we are able to come to a better understanding of what God is saying in His word.

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Thanks Jason…that means a lot!

      How does your message go over…is it well-received? I can imagine that it is.

  • Pingback: Small Group Roundup 8.14.12 | Sam O'Neal Writes

  • Margaret

    one of my favorites is “midrash”–where you wrestle over the Scriptures with another person and try to dig deeper into its meaning. Love to do this with my husband

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Yes…it’s so valuable. My wife challenges and stretches me in profound ways when we wrestle through the Scriptures together.

  • ellen flores

    Getting p’sd that Christian bloggers/pastors/magazines have chosen not to wrangle over degrees of nudity.

    On your list of “Things I Write About,” if NUDITY is not on your primary hit list, you’re irrelevant.

    Somebody has to start pushing back.

    • http://www.benreed.net Ben Reed

      Hey Ellen,
      Thanks for the comment, but I’m not sure I’m 100% tracking on the “degrees of nudity.” Have you written on it somewhere so that I can read up on what you’re talking about?