01 Oct, 2009

Arguments against Twitter

Posted by: Ben Reed In: Social Networking

  • Google Buzz

I really like Twitter.  Maybe you knew that…maybe you didn’t (all of my posts related to Twitter are HERE).  I’ve heard this about twitter so many times lately:

I don’t care that you walked the dog…or are heading into work…or are eating lunch now…or are sad. I don’t care, and nobody else does! That stuff just doesn’t matter to me.  And it’s just a waste of time for me and for those reading it.

Have you heard this, or something like it?  Frankly, I’m tired of hearing this from folks.  It’s not a great argument.  So few people (well…at least the ones that I follow) update about narcissistic and/or self-loathing goings-on that, to say you don‘t buy into Twitter because of those silly updates is like saying:

I can’t stand baseball. All they do is bunt, and that’s so boring.

I don’t like to read because there are so many big words.

I don’t like the Bible because the book of Revelation is so hard to understand!

The problem with this line of arguing is that people are taking a specific instance (that may or may not be true) and making a generalization about the whole.  I don’t even see many (if any) twitter updates from actual people (not twitter bots) that say, ‘I’m sad.’ Here are examples of typical Twitter updates (aka, “tweets”)…this is a screenshot from my computer that I took just now:

Screen shot 2009-10-01 at 10.38.09 AM

This is a form of a weak argument called “hasty generalization.”  We notice a few examples and quickly jump to broad-stroke conclusions. (HT: John Mark).  It’s not an invalid argument…just a weak one.  Hasty conclusions are much easier to jump to than justified ones.  Not enough of these type of frivolous updates have been observed to warrant throwing Twitter out with the proverbial bathwater.

Baseball isn’t all about the bunt. Very few people, if any, understand every word of Revelation.  And not every word in every book is a difficult word.

If you’re opposed to Twitter, fine.  But come up with some better excuses for not jumping on board.

Related posts:

  1. 9 Ways to Increase Your Twitter Influence
  2. 12 Reasons to Twitter
  3. The Language of Twitter
  4. Twitter?!?
  5. John Piper on Twitter

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to "Arguments against Twitter"

1 | Joe Donaldson

October 1st, 2009 at 1:36 pm

Avatar

You are so right, Ben. Twitter may not be for everyone so those for whom it is not should stay clear. Not everyone likes baseball pr likes to read. They don’t have to. But let those of us who are fans and readers enjoy it. I keep hoping that a people will arise that doesn’t criticize every new movement as stupid or evil. Do these same people have cell phones? Color TV’s? Indoor plumbing? Jump in or stay out – it’s your call. Just stop whining!

2 | Brent Moore

October 2nd, 2009 at 3:41 pm

Avatar

Ben i think it is about culture and context…i’m not on twitter right now because the culture i live in and want to influence the most is not into it…i.e. Milan, TN. But i have started regularly texting…which could be seen as a new technology…although you might argue it is so 10 years ago…here it is the newest and most effective way to reach adults and students…so that’s what i use

Comment Form



Organizations I believe in

Africa For JesusMission Clarksville

What I'm Doing...

Books Ben's Reading

Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely QuestionsSimple Small Groups: A User-Friendly Guide for Small Group LeadersUnder the Overpass: A Journey of Faith on the Streets of AmericaYour Jesus Is Too Safe: Outgrowing a Drive-Thru, Feel Good SaviorSeeker Small Groups: Engaging Spiritual Seekers in Life-Changing DiscussionsCrazy Love: Overwhelmed by a Relentless God

More of Ben's books »
Ben Reed's currently-reading book recommendations, reviews, favorite quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists